193522884663_574660007143Matt Bernstein

 
159922534053_510760007613Maurice Volaski
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Matt Bernstein wrote: On Aug 25 Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: Which version of e2fsprogs? There were some serious algorithmic inefficiencies in some

 
131228284068_543560007986kwijibo

 
142724354050_505160007442Joseph D Wagner

 
129726504378_566560007465Joseph D Wagner

 
141620224754_507960007566Joseph D Wagner
On May 19, 2005 12:19 -0500, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: May 19 09:56:37 spf1 kernel: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:361! fs/jbd is not ext3. Please direct this to the jbd people. ???

 
122223684820_527560007838David Clunie
Joseph D. Wagner wrote:

 
188927884666_595860007574Stephen C Tweedie
May 15 04:03:30 localhost kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sdd1): ext3_xattr_get: inode 63343526: bad block 165510584 May 15 04:03:34 localhost kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sdd1): ext3_xattr_ge

 
194326504008_599360007169Theodore Tso
Hi all, I was having a ext3 filesystem with writeback. yesterday my system crashed and now when i try to mount it, it gives me "Invalid argument". Following is the command line #mount -

 
143529994819_581460007908Andreas Dilger
ok, but just curious, if it is not cleanly umounted, mount shouldnt be able to mount it as ext2fs. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@xxxxxxx To: <anandtiwari

 
127820794931_503160007699Andreas Dilger
What I would do (if you dont mind overwriting the disk, presumably not if it is just new and doesnt contain important data) is to write a small test program to write the byte offset at the star

 
159823814066_541760007542Hans Yperman
Hi, On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 08:42, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: What I would do (if you dont mind overwriting the disk, presumably not if it is just new and doesnt contain important data) is to

 
125525454330_592160007553Theodore Tso
I guess these 2 facts need fixing: 1) loopback devices should not pass errors over to their underlying filesystems. I have a test partition setup for these circumstances. Ill try to reproduce

 
149524454202_550360007904Jason Sydes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [!! ive Cced several fs lists, please remove when when replying !!] hi all, from time to time i do some benchmarks for several filesystems and several

 
167328744902_549160007565kapilsampath
Hello, Hi, I connected my harddisk which had ext3 filesystem and some files archived in it as slave device and issued "mkfs /dev/hdb2" accidentally. Immediately I issued Ctrl C

 
139929664645_533060007804Damian Menscher
On Sun, April 24, 2005 14:06, kapil.sampath@xxxxxxxxx said: mount -t ext3 /dev/hdb2 mnt_pt/ mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdb2, or too many mounted file systems well

 
102825954185_509560007842Andreas Dilger
This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - #if 0 the following unused global functions: - journal.c: __journal_internal_check - journal.c: jo

 
163822674387_596960007891Mark Fasheh
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:24:16PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: On Apr 23, 2005 01:57 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly globa

 
152126834336_572460007774Adrian Bunk
This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - journal.c: remove the unused global function __journal_internal_check and move the check

 
162728604648_552960007335Andreas Dilger
This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - journal.c: remove the unused global function __journal_internal_check and move the check

 
109427504300_573960007298Andreas Dilger
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 04:32:44PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: On Jul 12, 2005 22:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: ... - journal.c: remove the unused global function __journal_internal_check

 
154321084893_572860007906Andreas Dilger
Hi Andreas, I need the following patch to make ext3 online resizing work with linux 2.6.11.6 on amd64 with a 32bit userland. Do the changes look o.k.? I converted everything to ext3 since it should

 
157028424172_595860007361evilninja
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [ccing 4 mailing lists, please reply to *one* list only!] hi, i was about to set up a new fs for my desktop machine and i could not decide which fs it

 
184823314044_518360007231Ziga Mahkovec
Hello all, I have a question about ext3/jbd for 2.4 as it pertains to the ARM architecture. The presence of the ext3 and/or jbd drivers seem to cause suspend/resume to stop working on our platform (

 
195826824090_560660007441Theodore Tso
Hi all! I have a slight problem: I have an external disk which contains one big filesystem (like a floppy) type ext3 (If you ask why: blame udev or maxtor, or me because I am stupid) which is approx

 
194123044190_524160007270Tom Cooper
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Theodore Tso wrote: Theoretically? Yes. Is it going to be easy? Unfortunatly, no one has written a tool to do way to do this is to buy or borrow a disk (disks are ch

 
153925864378_543260007582Tom Cooper
Norbert Preining said: On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Theodore Tso wrote: Theoretically? Yes. Ok. This is what I wanted to know. I thought exactely the same about how I have to proceed (I even have

 
133728844424_551060007234Joseph D Wagner
My UPS failed and my server took an unscheduled outage a few weeks ago. The only casualty appears to be a volume I used for backup. I usually maintain data on multiple hard disks, but in this case

 
187226904566_591660007620Tom Cooper
On Apr 09, 2005 16:07 -0400, Tom Cooper wrote: I thought removing the journal might help. I doubt that the files that interest me were open at the time. Sounds like the journal has some of the

 
114628324301_523760007512Tom Cooper
On Apr 11, 2005 11:29 -0400, Tom Cooper wrote: Andreas Dilger said: On Apr 09, 2005 16:07 -0400, Tom Cooper wrote: debugfs -R "feature needs_recovery" /dev/hdb1 is what you want

 
167823784817_586960007860Allen Ziegenfus
Hi, On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 21:07, Tom Cooper wrote: [root@marvin root]# fsck /dev/hdb1 fsck 1.32 (09-Nov-2002) e2fsck 1.32 (09-Nov-2002) fsck.ext2: Attempt to read block from filesystem resu

 
113821594446_551660007761Andreas Dilger
Hi, On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 17:13, Allen Ziegenfus wrote: However, at one point I forgot to pick the correct kernel at boot time and I ran the standard woody kernel instead which has this ext3 dr

 
109829294644_552360007486Stephen C Tweedie
On the fine day of Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:32:02 +0100 "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx said very eloquently: Anything else in the logs? You just hit a BUG(), and a bug or assert

 
175723104175_532260007048Allen Ziegenfus
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:51:23PM -0400, Allen Ziegenfus wrote: I am also happy to report that e2fsck has progressed from its number counting stage and moved on to telling me which files have du

 
194323724880_524460007317Andreas Gruenbacher
kfree() handles NULL pointers fine - checking is redundant. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@xxxxxx --- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3-orig/fs/ext3/acl.c 2005-03-02 08:37:55.000000000 +0100 +++ lin

 
175622864696_557360007315kewlemer
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: On Friday 25 March 2005 23:11, Jesper Juhl wrote: kfree() handles NULL pointers fine - checking is redundant. Looks good. Can you also fix

 
143322934474_587960007065HansJoachim Picht
Hello, sorry if the question was asked a couple of times before but I couldnt find any useful hinds to this problem using google and the listman search-engine of the archive of this list. Somehow t

 
163929084995_528360007433Tim Allen
Good Day I am writing a paper comparing the features of NTFS and the EXT3 file systems. Could anyone point me to any websites where I could get more information on EXT3? I have performed the normal

 
177021874743_594560007968Christian
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 09:45:06AM +1100, Tim Allen wrote: Weve got some units in clients vehicles which are running Fedora core 1. Weve can log into them over ssh remotely there is no console

 
199424524340_587460007949JxE9rxF4me Petazzoni
Hi! I am using a 377GB ext3-filesystem with evms, spanned over two disks. This filesystem has worked for more than two years without any problems, it stores around 30.000 images with sizes between 5

 
119124524235_588760007390Andreas Dilger
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 JÃrÃme Petazzoni wrote: A few wild ideas/questions : 1) Is there a way to check the size of the journal of an ext3 filesystem ? I mea

 
120124584684_567660007493Jonathan Purcell
Hi folks, 2) Would it be difficult to implement "freeze" of ext3 filesystem - that is, blocking all I/O to the filesystem until its "unfrozen" (XFS can do that), for t

 
174229774400_573660007831Marc Gerritzen
On Mar 04, 2005 17:26 +0000, Jonathan Purcell wrote: I am having some trouble using the ext2online utility, I have reduced the problem down to its simplist form, and it goes soemthing like this

 
116820294017_591160007528Joseph D Wagner
Hello everybody, reading about the speed improvements possible with (on boot) preloaded files (which should be continuous on disk) I searched for a ext3 defrag program. I found an ext2 defrag prog

 
187929684980_521860007676Joseph D Wagner
Hello everybody, reading about the speed improvements possible with (on boot) preloaded files (which should be continuous on disk) I searched for a ext3 defrag program. I found an ext2 defrag prog

 
116720324128_540360007154Joseph D Wagner
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:14:01PM +0100, Ph. Marek wrote: Hello everybody, reading about the speed improvements possible with (on boot) preloaded files (which should be continuous on disk)

 
179421204612_547760007949Joseph D Wagner
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:14:01PM +0100, Ph. Marek wrote: Hello everybody, reading about the speed improvements possible with (on boot) preloaded files (which should be continuous on disk)

 
197025384925_536960007184Theodore Tso
On Thursday 03 March 2005 17:10, Theodore Tso wrote: The e2defrag program had some problems where it only worked on 1k blocksizes, if I remember correctly. It was also extremely dangerous in t

 
120024434214_521760007188Theodore Tso
On Thursday 03 March 2005 17:10, Theodore Tso wrote: The e2defrag program had some problems where it only worked on 1k blocksizes, if I remember correctly. It was also extremely dangerous in t

 
174622324155_572660007997Ph Marek
I approached the problem from several different angles. Approach #1 - Partition Must Be Unmounted to Defrag Advantages: * Minimize chance of file system corruption because no other