| 161525574786_573060007117 | Sevrin Robstad |
|
|
|
| |
| 153021034370_554860007843 | Message not availabl |
|
|
|
| |
| 114829084037_574260007479 | Molle Bestefich |
|
|
|
| |
| 155921134051_595060007039 | Francois Barre |
|
On Monday July 17, quackyo@xxxxxxxx wrote:
I have written some posts about this before... My 6 disk RAID 5 broke
down because of hardware failure. When I tried to get it upnrunning again
I did |
|
| |
| 106422484466_562460007246 | Francois Barre |
|
|
|
| |
| 103820974803_582460007897 | Tuomas Leikola |
|
|
|
| |
| 194223575000_531160007171 | Jeff Breidenbach |
|
|
|
| |
| 115420534078_519160007459 | Jeff Breidenbach |
|
|
|
| |
| 167123544573_572360007190 | Bill Davidsen |
|
|
|
| |
| 176223684438_522860007920 | Neil Brown |
|
Hi all,
I have a RAID6 array where a disk went bad. I removed the old disk, put in an
identical one, and repartitioned the new disk. I am now trying to add the
new partition to the array, but I |
|
| |
| 147420294017_527660007845 | Neil Brown |
|
Thanks for the reply, Neil. Here is my version:
[root@paul log]# mdadm --version
mdadm - v2.3.1 - 6 February 2006
This is a somewhat production system, running Fedora Core 5. Official
packages co |
|
| |
| 117227954201_517260007106 | Neil Brown |
|
Please, please! I am dead in the water!
To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5 system, using /dev/hd[acdeg]
2 and /dev/sd[ab]2. /dev/hdd went bad so I replaced the drive and tried to
ad |
|
| |
| 134322614159_542260007955 | Paul Waldo |
|
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:25, Neil Brown wrote:
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Please, please! I am dead in the water!
To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5 |
|
| |
| 188221234308_545560007611 | Paul Waldo |
|
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
At this point, Id just be happy to be able to get the degraded array back up
and running. Is there any way to do that? Thanks!
mdadm --as |
|
| |
| 164526084979_508360007971 | Paul Waldo |
|
|
|
| |
| 100323095000_502060007853 | Paul Waldo |
|
|
|
| |
| 186527594648_506560007755 | Dan Graham |
|
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Here is the dmesg output. No log files are created with the FC5 rescue disk.
Thanks!
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:59, Neil Brown wrote:
|
|
| |
| 117222744015_533160007468 | Paul Clements |
|
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dan Graham wrote:
Hello;
I have an existing, active ext3 filesystem which I would like to convert to
a RAID 1 ext3 filesystem with minimal down time. After casting about |
|
| |
| 128525794591_559360007437 | Robert Heinzmann |
|
Paul Clements wrote:
Is 16 blocks a large enough area?
Maybe. The superblock will be between 64KB and 128KB from the end of the
partition. This depends on the size of the partition:
|
|
| |
| 120426784044_518360007880 | Paul Waldo |
|
Still no joy after zeroing the superblock, Mikael. :-(
[root@paul ~]# mdadm --examine /dev/hdd2
/dev/hdd2:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.00
UUID : 2e316d9e:20cac82a |
|
| |
| 115327654189_515360007775 | Neil Brown |
|
Hi i have small problem when i booting i have md1 as /boot md2 as swap
and md3 as / (root) and when it come to md3 it say something like "md3
has no identity information" i cant read it |
|
| |
| 100626494534_565560007465 | linuxmania lizhi |
|
A client of mine desperately wants a Dell solution rather than a
self-build. They are looking at an external Dell box with 15 x 500GB SATA
drives in it and a Dell 1U host controller - but the connec |
|
| |
| 140928874739_542560007436 | linuxmania lizhi |
|
On Thursday July 13, linuxmania.lizhi@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi all,
Im new to MD RAID. When I read the book "Understanding the Linux Kernel", I know that there are several layers between Fil |
|
| |
| 189325034014_548460007047 | Gordon Henderson |
|
Last year, there were discussions on this list about the possible
use of a co-processor (Intels IOP333) to compute raid 5/6s
parity data.
We are about to see low cost, multi core cpu chips with very |
|
| |
| 192123014726_596560007487 | Burn Alting |
|
|
|
| |
| 184526394251_503360007035 | Andrew Skolarz |
|
|
|
| |
| 180927994685_534260007399 | Andrew Skolarz |
|
|
|
| |
| 180728634285_554660007504 | Andrew Skolarz |
|
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 06:10 schrieben Sie:
Care to enlighten the rest of us what did the trick?
Dex
please disregard this email .. after doing more google research i have
re-assembled the |
|
| |
| 198221804006_599760007103 | Justin Piszcz |
|
On Tuesday July 11, pletopia@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Checksum : 4aa9094a - expected 4aa908c4
This is a bit scary. You have a single-bit error, either in the
checksum or elsewhere in the superbloc |
|
| |
| 104325854405_577060007890 | Jan Engelhardt |
|
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Neil,
It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how
come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l?
Is t |
|
| |
| 125623944528_550860007320 | Jan Engelhardt |
|
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Neil,
It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how
come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l?
Is t |
|
| |
| 154422374118_522860007571 | David Greaves |
|
|
|
| |
| 162823874434_591460007721 | David Greaves |
|
|
|
| |
| 141729154902_542460007565 | Vladimir Strycek |
|
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read
this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL?
GPL.
Ill make that |
|
| |
| 152729554150_593360007700 | Vladimir Strycek |
|
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read
this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL?
GPL.
Ill make that |
|
| |
| 182229814094_535060007523 | Mario BitKoenig Holb |
|
Hello Vladimir,
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote:
VS Hi,
VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical
VS 200GB hdd
VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks |
|
| |
| 167020314760_578960007339 | Mario BitKoenig Holb |
|
Hello Vladimir,
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote:
VS Hi,
VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical
VS 200GB hdd
VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks |
|
| |
| 136028884727_579460007659 | Neil Brown |
|
|
|
| |
| 151522174574_541660007485 | Tejun Heo |
|
|
|
| |
| 198221684439_513160007162 | Bill Davidsen |
|
On Tuesday July 11, htejun@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Christian Pernegger wrote:
The fact that the disk had changed minor numbers after it was plugged
back in bugs me a bit. (was sdc before, sde afte |
|
| |
| 183229234142_592660007631 | Justin Piszcz |
|
|
|
| |
| 144829434663_520760007923 | Justin Piszcz |
|
|
|
| |
| 154720904810_527360007611 | Christian Pernegger |
|
|
|
| |
| 193323994829_550760007469 | Molle Bestefich |
|
Hi!
I created a sw-raid md0 and a LVM above with four 250GB Samsung SATA
disks a couple of months ago. I am not an raid expert but I thought I
could handle it with a little help of my friends from g |
|
| |
| 199227964638_543060007738 | Henrik Holst |
|
Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich <at gmail.com writes:
From the paste bin:
443: root <at ned ~ # mdadm --examine /dev/sd[abcd]
Shows that all 4 devices are ACTIVE SYNC....
|
|
| |
| 159327584660_573660007933 | Karl Voit |
|
Henrik Holst <henrik.holst <at idgmail.se writes:
Karl Voit wrote:
[snip]
Well this is because of the false(?) superblocks of sda-sdd in comparison
to
sda1 to sdd1.
I dont |
|
| |
| 136621314875_502960007606 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
| 195228874697_576260007581 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
| 137320924980_520160007794 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |
| 167025914590_530860007517 | Karl Voit |
|
|
|
| |