124129414175_545860007853	Mark Fasheh
On Sep 10, 2008 11:46 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:49:34 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx wrote: The following patches are the latest attempt at implementing a
122525884718_581960007398	Mark Fasheh
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxx Any block based fs (this patch includes ext3) just has to declare its own fiemap() function and then call this generic function with its own get_block_t. Thi
197427844805_567260007846	Andreas Dilger
Hi, This is the implementation for large EA support in ext4. Note that this also helps to have a larger number of EAs since large EAs get written out to a new inode instead of the EA block. If valu
136129884260_505460007562	Aneesh Kumar KV
在 2008-08-25一的 16:47 -0600，Andreas Dilger写道： On Aug 25, 2008 21:30 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: This is the implementation for large EA support i
175523274508_548060007764	Andreas Dilger
Hi, This is the implementation for large EA support in ext4. Note that this also helps to have a larger number of EAs since large EAs get written out to a new inode instead of the EA block. If valu
124725164704_542260007714	Aneesh Kumar KV
With delayed allocation we need to make sure block are reserved before we attempt to allocate them. Otherwise we get block allocation failure (ENOSPC) during writepages which cannot be handled. This
127421994302_599360007969	Aneesh Kumar KV
在 2008-08-25一的 16:47 -0600，Andreas Dilger写道： On Aug 25, 2008 21:30 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: This is the implementation for large EA support i
139029924752_519560007537	Aneesh Kumar KV
This patch add dirty block accounting using percpu_counters. Delayed allocation block reservation is now done by updating dirty block counter. In the later patch we switch to non delalloc mode if the
104020254524_530060007422	Aneesh Kumar KV
With delayed allocation we need to make sure block are reserved before we attempt to allocate them. Otherwise we get block allocation failure (ENOSPC) during writepages which cannot be handled. This
186328344750_537160007023	Aneesh Kumar KV
This patch add dirty block accounting using percpu_counters. Delayed allocation block reservation is now done by updating dirty block counter. In the later patch we switch to non delalloc mode if the
113425614540_583960007513	Akira Fujita
Otherwise we skip group 0 during block allocation. This cause ENOSPC even if we have free blocks in group 0. This should be merged with defrag. The expected_group changes are introduced by defrag pat
155222564713_585460007731	Akira Fujita
Otherwise we skip group 0 during block allocation. This cause ENOSPC even if we have free blocks in group 0. This should be merged with defrag. The expected_group changes are introduced by defrag pat
182326394723_557560007387	Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-25一的 16:50 +0530，Aneesh Kumar K.V写道： delayed allocation allocate blocks during writepages. That also means we cannot handle block alloc
111128754412_563660007492	Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-25一的 16:50 +0530，Aneesh Kumar K.V写道： delayed allocation allocate blocks during writepages. That also means we cannot handle block alloc
105720384326_580760007640	Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-25一的 16:50 +0530，Aneesh Kumar K.V写道： During block reservation if we dont have enough blocks left, retry block reservation with smaller
183125444200_537060007183	Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-25一的 16:50 +0530，Aneesh Kumar K.V写道： During block reservation if we dont have enough blocks left, retry block reservation with smaller
188429354439_559760007688	Aneesh Kumar KV
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da47440881b36c1f4 which changed the type from long to s6
132726114327_505060007161	Aneesh Kumar KV
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da47440881b36c1f4 which changed the type from long to s6
143722974036_585060007211	Andreas Dilger
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:35 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 01:27:19PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: @@ -
134229914250_566860007660	Andreas Dilger
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:35 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 01:27:19PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:50 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: @@ -
130826284203_550960007585	Manish Katiyar
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:50:28 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da474408
169228834520_513160007308	Manish Katiyar
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:50:28 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da474408
182028074919_514660007104	Theodore Tso
Close the filehandle and return in case if we are unable to expand the directory during write. Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx --- debugfs/debugfs.c | 1 + 1 f
130822934402_534460007334	Theodore Tso
Close the filehandle and return in case if we are unable to expand the directory during write. Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx --- debugfs/debugfs.c | 1 + 1 f
155624854325_580660007122	Theodore Tso
Below patch ensures that cleanup is done properly in ext2fs_initialize from all return paths in case of errors. Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx --- lib/ext2fs/ini
146624614751_566960007749	Theodore Tso
Below patch ensures that cleanup is done properly in ext2fs_initialize from all return paths in case of errors. Signed-off-by: "Manish Katiyar" <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx --- lib/ext2fs/ini
125426614632_577460007110	Theodore Tso
Ted, I was not sure if I should change it to EXT2_OBSO_OS_MASIX as it is currently defined in ext2_fs.h. Let me know if you think that is the correct way to fix it, will redo the patch. Compilation
108126124918_500060007774	Theodore Tso
Ted, I was not sure if I should change it to EXT2_OBSO_OS_MASIX as it is currently defined in ext2_fs.h. Let me know if you think that is the correct way to fix it, will redo the patch. Compilation
110520654067_550760007210	Christoph Hellwig
Hi Linus, Please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git for_linus This patch series contains a number of bug fixes that fixes various BUG() crashes discove
184229664695_516660007848	Aneesh Kumar KV
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:44:39PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: ext4: Initialize writeback_index to 0 when allocating a new inode Since commit 7d455e0030eeab820773e7786605be4d9e56a0
128922374308_503960007277	Aneesh Kumar KV
percpu_counter_sum_and_sub(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount) This will be later used by ext4 code. It adds up the local per cpu counter values to global count and subtract amount from the gloa
178921604939_542060007731	Mingming Cao
在 2008-08-22五的 19:04 +0530，Aneesh Kumar K.V写道： With delayed allocation we need to make sure block are reserved before we attempt to allocate them
153120164342_544860007100	Peter Zijlstra
在 2008-08-22五的 19:04 +0530，Aneesh Kumar K.V写道： fbc- count is of type s64. The change was introduced by 0216bfcffe424a5473daa4da47440881b36c1f4 wh
122221224166_528960007576	Hidehiro Kawai
The patch titled ext4: dont try to resize if there are no reserved gdt blocks left has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was ext4-dont-try-to-resize-if-there-are-no-reserved-gd
149924714542_519460007314	Rishikesh K Rajak
Hello, On Thu 21-08-08 19:09:27, Hidehiro Kawai wrote: The patch titled jbd: fix error handling for checkpoint io has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is jbd-fix
104129274551_534960007458	Eric Sandeen
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:12:52PM +0530, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: Wanted to know if anyone is getting the same problem too. rel="nofollow" bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11389 b
162727554618_556660007553	Mingming Cao
(oops, left off the s390 list on the first send) The following changes get ext4 on s390 up and running for me. the switch from ffs to __ffs changes where we start counting (if the first bit is set,
129627064570_563960007587	Jose R Santos
The following series of patches implement API call needed to handle 64-bit block numbers. Im concentrating mainly in providing the API call first and if the interfaces are sane, we can go ahead and
173923764709_590560007339	Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Use blk64_t for blocks in struct ext2_file. The ext2_file structure is never exposed through the libext2fs API so it is safe to use 64-bit blocks for blockn
148121654810_502360007448	Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add ext2_off64_t type. The ext2_off_t is u32. Creating a new 64-bit ext2_off64_t for 64bit offsets. Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx --
133724014375_588860007341	Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add 64-bit dirblock interface. Add new ext2fs_(read|write)_dir_block3() routines that take blk64_t as an input. Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxx
134623774095_596560007270	Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add 64-bit alloc interface. Add new ext2fs_new_block2(), ext2fs_get_free_blocks2() and ext2fs_alloc_block2() that take and return blk64_t. Signed-off-by: J
151722394977_508660007131	Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Use new ext2fs_super_and_bgd_loc2 call in libext2fs. The new ext2fs_super_and_bgd_loc2() function has some changes aside from just blk64_t support. Lets ma
167326174507_538260007173	Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add 64-bit getsize interface. Added interface capable of opening 64-bit block device. Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx -- lib/ext2fs/ext
172120024338_553160007698	Jose R Santos
From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx Add 64-bit mkjournal.c interface Added 64-bit mkjournal.c interface. Needed to zero inode tables. Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx -- l
198023624098_535460007849	Aneesh Kumar KV
Hi, I am getting this even with the latest patch queue. The test program is a modified fsstress with fallocate support. mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed for inode 377954 at logical offse
169525964226_579160007169	Aneesh Kumar KV
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:16:44PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: mpage_da_map_blocks block allocation failed for inode 323784 at logical offset 313 with max blocks 11 with error -28 This
106120774409_503760007286	Aneesh Kumar KV
在 2008-08-20三的 23:57 +0530，Aneesh Kumar K.V写道： On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:53:31AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:16:44PM
116828374903_567660007424	Theodore Tso
On Aug 20, 2008 07:53 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: Also, this is one of the places where it might help if we did something like: freeblocks = percpu_counter_read(&sbi- s_freeblocks_count
185029414427_518760007453	Theodore Tso
在 2008-08-20三的 07:53 -0400，Theodore Tso写道： On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:16:44PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: mpage_da_map_blocks block alloca